The government has released its long-awaited “Renters Reform” white paper. The 86 page document, available here, set out plans for fundamental changes for the lettings industry over the next few years.
57% of landlords tell us their biggest concern is increasing compliance requirements, so it’s vital you understand these proposed changes to best support them.
We know you’re short on time, so our Legal and Compliance Director David Cox, one of the lettings industry’s top legal experts, has gone through the white paper and supporting documents for you.
In this article we’ve outlined the key announcements. We’ve also included David’s responses to common questions posed by agents and developers on his recent webinar (watch the replay here).
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “Does this apply to non-housing act tenancies?”
David: “No. It is only relevant to Assured & Assured Shorthold Tenancies governed by the Housing Act 1988”.
Q: “Does this apply to student properties?”
David: “Yes. The government is not making any exceptions for student properties, apart from purpose built student accommodation, e.g. halls of residence. All other student properties are included”.
Q: “Does this mean agents will no longer be able to earn money for tenancy renewals?”
David: “I’m afraid so. You’ll need to plan for how you adjust your business model to account for this loss of income.”
Q: “Will landlords now be responsible for the council tax, given all tenancies will be periodic?”
David: “The Leeds Council vs. Broadley case (2016) ruled that if the contract is a statutory periodic, then the landlord is technically liable for the council tax. So, in theory, yes. There’s nothing in the white paper around this, though, so it needs clarifying by the government.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “Will the tribunal be able to increase as well as decrease rents?”
David: “No. The judges will not be able to suggest a rent higher than what the landlord has proposed. They will only be given powers to reduce the proposed rent increase if they deem it to be excessive.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “Will the landlord have to pay for the injunction themselves?”
David: “It’s to be confirmed. Based on the way it’s drafted, I would assume that the landlord will have to take the injunction and the agent will be able to claim that from the tenant’s deposit, so long as it’s written into the contract that the tenant needs to indemnify the landlord.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “What’s to stop landlords using the new ground for selling the property to get around the Section 21 ban and evict the tenant only to replace them with another?”
David: “Like with Section 21, you won’t be able to use it for 6 months. The government has also put in place some restrictions to stop it being used for nefarious reasons. Once the tenant has left, you won’t be able to re-market the property for at least 3 months. Something similar has been in place in Scotland for some time, where you will need to demonstrate that the property is genuinely on the market for sale.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “What if it’s a condition of the landlord’s buy-to-let mortgage that they can’t rent to someone on benefits?”
David: “If it’s going to be banned, then it wouldn’t be enforceable for a mortgage company to still include an illegal clause in their contract. They’d be in reach of the Consumer Protection Regulations and Consumer Rights Act. More than 90% of lenders have already dropped their “No DSS” clauses. Others are saying that even though the clause remains, they won’t enforce it. If your landlord has such a clause in their contract, it’s a good idea to contact the mortgage company and ask them to write a letter to say they aren’t going to hold the landlord to the “no DSS” rule because it’ll be against the law.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “What if a building’s Head Lease says no pets? How will the “no pets” rule work?”
David: “In many ways this is a continuation of the rules that exist today. You’re allowed to withhold consent if you have a reasonable excuse, and not being allowed to have a pet due to it being a condition of the superior lease on the property would count as an acceptable response.”
Q: “Can we still charge higher rents for a tenant that wants to move in with a pet?”
David: “Yes, I don’t see why not. There’s nothing in the tenant fees ban that says you can’t. We’ll have to wait and see what the Bill itself actually says though.”
Key announcements:
Your questions answered:
Q: “How will the new Ombudsman interact with the different Ombudsman for agents? Will they get combined?”
David: “The government have not provided any information on this yet.”
Your questions answered:
Q: “What’s your best guess at some actual dates?”
David: “Given the timings involved to get each stage through Parliament, the earliest implementation date would be April 2024 if the government pushed things through as quickly as possible. That is unlikely to happen, so 2025 may be a more realistic date.”
As this is such an important topic, we’ll be dedicating time every month on our “News Hour with David Cox” webinar to cover the proposals in more detail. We’ll also share any updates as they become available. This is your opportunity to get your questions answered by the expert.